Introverts and Twitter
Joe Kissell reckons he doesn’t like Twitter, Instant Messaging and similar ways of communicating because he’s an introvert. TidBITS Opinion: Instant Messaging for Introverts:
From time to time, someone I know asks me an ordinary and reasonable question: “What’s your iChat (or Skype) ID?” My usual reply is to give them the information along with a big disclaimer: I’m almost never logged in. … having done a considerable amount of introspection, I’m inclined to think that my personality type is fundamentally ill-suited to instant messaging. Specifically, I’d like to advance the thesis that - for some people at least - an aversion to instant messaging is a natural consequence of one’s temperament, and that this is neither good nor bad in and of itself, though it does of course have consequences.
Joe’s article is fairly long, thoughtful and detailed. He sets out his own personality type, his work patterns and his communication preferences. He explains how he tried Instant Messaging and Twitter, but they just didn’t work for him.
Whether you’re in favour of services like Twitter, or hate them, his article is worth reading.
Communication is all about getting messages from one person to another. We can make it most successful by using strategies that work for both parties. This article adds to our knowledge about how to get messages across.
Be sure to also read (and contribute) to the follow-up discussion.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
April 8, 2008 No Comments
Collaboration techniques - so many choices
There’s a world of difference between emailing documents around for each contributor to have their say, and simply sharing a document in a place where all can access it, potentially working on it at the same time, and maybe discussing it as you go, through the same web page.
Read/WriteWeb carries a detailed feature comparison between Office Live Workspace and Google Docs (see below). If you collaborate with others on documents then you should definitely try out these online / web-enabled offerings, or others such as Zoho.
The screenshot shows me using Google Docs to chat with a friend about a spreadsheet she was using to evaluate some business ideas. I’ve disguised names and actual content so as to preserve her privacy. Because we were both online at the same time, with the document open, we were able to chat about it and discuss details.
Another possibility is to use Mac screen sharing, as explained by Adam Engst in a recent TidBITs column (see below). While Google Docs is completely open to any user and Office Live favours those who use Microsoft Office, the Mac screen sharing technique obviously suits Mac users.
Office Live Workspace vs Google Docs
Integration
Google Docs is the whole offering - there is no offline software to use, but if you needed to edit files with offline software, like Microsoft Office or Open Office, because you hit a wall with Google Docs’ current abilities, you could do so by downloading the file to your PC.
However, since Office Live Workspace is the web-enabled aspect of Microsoft Office software, integration is key. From within the workspace, you can click “edit” to open the file with the Microsoft Office program. The service also offers an add-in that works with Office XP, 2003, or 2007. The add-in allows you to open and save documents to and from the workspace via the software’s File Menu (XP, 2003) or Office menu (2007).
[Via Read/WriteWeb: Office Live Workspace vs Google Docs: Feature-by-Feature Comparison.]
Leopard’s iChat Screen Sharing Perfect for Quick Collaboration
Collaborative editing isn’t new to TidBITS. We’ve made plenty of use of SubEthaEdit, and Tonya’s mind was already in a collaborative space from playing recently with Google Docs and Zoho Writer. But iChat screen sharing adds voice contact, and you’re not merely sharing a document, you’re editing and reading the same document simultaneously in real time, so it’s perfect for quick, lightweight brainstorming and cooperation. Not to mention the instant gratification of solving, in five minutes, with excellent communication, a problem that might have taken our heavyweight email correspondence system two days, with far clunkier communication. In short, it was efficient, satisfying, successful, fast, and fun. You should try it!
[Via : TidBITS Business Apps: Leopard's iChat Screen Sharing Perfect for Quick Collaboration.]
March 5, 2008 No Comments

















